A Conspiracy is Not a 'Theory' When it is Slapping You in Your Stupid Face

Regular readers here will know I’m a JFK assassination buff. I make no secret about my belief that elements of the CIA, FBI and the mob were involved in a wide-ranging plot to kill the President, and that Lyndon Johnson most likely also at least knew it was going to happen.

My belief is not just based on reading books, but also on practical experience. In the early ‘90s I got involved with a group of researchers led by Jim Marrs, author of the book “Crossfire.” During the course of that involvement, I actually interviewed some of the witnesses who were in Dealey Plaza that day, including Jean Hill and Bill Newman, along with Jim Leavelle, the Dallas detective who was handcuffed to Lee Harvey Oswald when he was killed by Jack Ruby. To cap it all off, on one weird night at the first location in the Dallas West End district of what ultimately became the 6th Floor Museum, I participated in an interview with LBJ crony Billie Sol Estes and Johnson’s longtime mistress, Madeline Brown.

So yeah, I enjoy analyzing conspiracies, and I know a good conspiracy when I see one happening in real time. Yet I still get criticism at times for believing in such a wide-ranging conspiracy with so many participants. Critics invariably resort to saying that’s too many participants to keep it all under wraps.

But of course, it wasn’t all kept under wraps, not at all. Within hours of the killing, there was always an abundance of information in the public domain that conflicted with the official version of events. As just one of a thousand examples, the Dallas Chief of Police spent half a day mis-identifying the rifle found on the 6th floor as a 7 mm Mauser. Why did he do that? Because no less than 2 Dallas law enforcement officers who actually found the rifle identified it that way both verbally and in signed affidavits.

Just one of half a dozen witnesses to the killing of JD Tippett described a shooter who looked anything like Oswald, and she was a loon who ended up in a mental institution. Criminal underworld figures like Johnny Roselli and hitman Charles Harrelson boasted about their participation in the plot over the years, as did Watergate figures Frank Sturgis and E. Howard Hunt.

From Day 1, this conspiracy was not kept under wraps, not even a little bit, to such an extent that, when the Warren Report was issued almost a year later, less than 40% of the public was willing to accept its findings. That was despite the fact that the corrupt media at the time had mounted a massive public brainwashing campaign promoting Oswald as the government-preferred “lone nut” assassin.

It is a simple fact that the societal atmosphere in the U.S. in the wake of the JFK assassination was very similar to the atmosphere we’ve lived through since 2016.

Fast forward to 2023, and Monday’s drop, 3 years too late to do any good, of the Durham Report. That report describes a mountain of proof showing that our country has just been put through a massive conspiracy involving pretty much every senior official at the DOJ and FBI in 2016, along with senior officials at the CIA, the entire staff of the Mueller investigation, half of congress and about 90% of today’s even more corrupt news media that mounted another massive public brainwashing operation which tried to convince us that Donald Trump “colluded” with Russia during the 2016 election campaign.

And I’m a conspiracy theorist for doubting the Oswald “lone nut” theory? Really?

During the course of the past 7 years, how many times did the media label anyone who doubted one element of the DOJ/FBI/CIA narrative about Trump as a “conspiracy theorist,” only to see absolute proof arise within months or just weeks proving the conspiracy theory to be fact?

I know I’m not the only one here who was suspended multiple times by the evil social media censors at Facebook and Twitter for writing “conspiracy theory” posts that were proven 100% true within weeks. That happened to me at least 6 times.

Literally every single element of this sordid episode the media has labeled to be a “conspiracy theory” throughout all of this has morphed into a proven fact by the public record within 3-6 months. That has in fact been the most consistent element in all of this.

So, yeah, I’m a “conspiracy theorist,” and happy to be one. Decades of research and study have given me an ability to recognize a hoax pretty much as soon as I see one, and to not be shy about pointing it out to others.

Like the JFK assassination, what the whole Russia Collusion hoax should have taught all of us is that a “conspiracy” is not a “theory” when it is standing in front of us, slapping our stupid face.

That is all.