Sunday's Silly Absurdities: King Charles Scolds, Kamala Toils, and the Media Covers for a Gun-Toting Democrat

You may be one of the millions of Americans who watched the carefully prepared speech King Charles III read from his TelePrompter Saturday (these globalists always must have a TelePrompter handy, after all) and thought, ‘well, that was a heartfelt and even humble speech.’

But then, you also might be one of the millions who went out to social media a little later and saw this video of the new King abusing a servant right before he read his text:

Laura Kuenssberg Translator @BBCLauraKT

"The servant must clear my desk for me. I can't be expected to move things."

I mean, he’s a king, you know? No king should be bothered to have to move his own ink well a few inches across his desk, should he? Of course not. This is the purpose of menial servitude, after all. It is their lot in life.

It’s always useful to be treated to a moment of candor to reveal the real nature of the wooden, petulant individual reading his ‘heartfelt’ tribute to his mummy to the camera for public consumption.

Working at Buckingham Palace is going to be a far different, and less pleasant experience now than it has been over the past 70 years.

Speaking of the new King, here are the Democrat hacks at @NPR fervently hoping he will continue his decades of pushing the climate alarm narrative from his new office:

NPR @NPR

King Charles III has a history of wading into politics — a departure from Queen Elizabeth II's strict neutrality. Here's a look at how he may use his position to promote causes, such as climate change.

n.prAs King Charles III takes the crown, here’s how he may focus his reignThroughout her 70 years as queen, Elizabeth II sought to maintain strict political neutrality. While Charles has been careful not to tread too publicly, he does have a history of wading into politics.

Here’s an excerpt from that advocacy piece thinly disguised as a ‘news’ story:

As King Charles III begins his reign as Britain's new monarch, focus turns to how he may use his position as head of state to promote causes that he's been passionate about for decades — the environment and climate change, in particular, as well as other philanthropic efforts.

Throughout her 70 years on the throne and up until her death on Thursday, as monarch, Queen Elizabeth II sought to maintain strict political neutrality, going so far as not to vote.

And while Charles has been careful not to tread too publicly, he does have a history of wading into politics, something over which some British officials have voiced concern that he may be more willing to do as king.

Climate change has long been a focus for Charles

Nowhere has Charles been more outspoken than the threat posed by climate change. Last year, speaking at the opening ceremony of the COP26 climate summit in Glasgow, Scotland, he warned that the time for addressing climate change had "quite literally run out."

In order to tackle the problem, he said, "We have to put ourselves on what might be called a war-like footing."

[End]

“a war-like footing” doesn’t sound like a man eager to avoid the politics of climate alarmism in his new job, does it?

Queen Elizabeth II, of course, was always studiously careful to avoid demeaning her office by engaging it in the nasty business of politics. We can hope Charles might honor her by continuing on in that tradition, but it seems doubtful he has the emotional maturity or common sense and good grace to do so. Instead, it seems safe to expect an obnoxious stream of sanctimonious TelePrompter readings once he has bidden his staff to place the ink well on his desk just so.

Old climate alarmist John Kerry understands the problem here, of the King being seen to tangle politics up in his new job. So he flew all the way over to London on his carbon-spewing private jet to utter this bit of sophistry to the always fawning press that follows him around:

Daily Caller @DailyCaller

John Kerry on climate change: "It's not political...It's a universal issue defined by science."

“it’s not political…”. LOL.

It’s all political, folks. That is literally ALL it is. These people eat lies for breakfast and regurgitate them for lunch.

Man, are we going to miss the Queen.

Let’s move on…

Enough about England and its royal family - America has its own set of entitled, disagreeable public leaders. Take our nominal vice president as an example:

Daily Wire @realDailyWire

Kamala: "Today, the business of our work is for the council to report on the work that has occurred since our last meeting across these areas. We will today also discuss the work yet ahead, the work we must still do."

Kamala's working, y'all. She's working on the work that must be done to work on the work to come. And then she'll work to work just as hard as she worked when she was working to work on the work of the past. You know, like how she’s worked on the work of the work as Old Joe Biden’s “Border Czar.” That’s some working on the work to be worked she’s done right there, huh?

Work.

whew.

Oh, but that’s not all. Check out this outtake from the very same speech:

Wall Street Silver @WallStreetSilv

When you try to Inspire like JFK declaring we are going to the Moon ... ... but you're Kamala Harris ... 🔊sound🤣 (wait for it)

Hey, Brits: If you think you got it tough, just think about the fact that this is who the silly Colonies have sitting just one heartbeat away from the presidency. Jolly good show, innit?

Oh, hey, this happened out in Los Angeles Saturday:

I know what you’re thinking. You’re thinking, hey, wait a minute - Karen Bass is a gun-banning Democrat, isn’t she? What’s she doing with guns in her house, just waiting for someone to come steal?

Seems odd, doesn’t it? A little hypocritical? Unseemly and unsightly in a political sense? You bet it does.

But fret not, for the corrupt news media was ready and waiting to ride in to the rescue with headlines like the one in the tweet below by the corrupt Democrat operatives at The Hill:

"two items" is now the new corrupt media way of describing two guns stolen from the home of any random Democrat who claims to want to ban guns.

Really and truly, if Democrats and their media toadies didn’t already exist, nobody in their right minds could ever possibly dream of making them up.

That is all.