Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dutchmn007's avatar

Only thing Pam Blondie seems interested in is her next Fox News segment appearance. If Trump wanted a woman in there (questionable on its face) why couldn’t he nominate a Pit Bull like Judge Janine Pirro? After the Gaetz nomination blew up & Blondie’s card was played, I got a sinking feeling in the pit of my stomach.

Be more than happy to be wrong but appears Blondie could be/is Jeff Sessions 2.0.

Expand full comment
Jeff Walther's avatar

I want to believe in David's hypothesis about prosecutions to come. That might fit in with leaking the "nothing to see here" memo through Axios. If it is going to be blatantly untrue, then the administration doesn't want to embarrass a friendly media with the memo.

There's also the fact that it could be difficult to use videos as evidence if all of the jurors, i.e. the whole population, has already seen the videos. So an excuse to keep them secret a while longer could play into this.

But who knows?

Expand full comment

No posts