I asked a former CIA agent a few years back who was with them in the 60s if the CIA was involved with the JFK assassination and he replied yes, they probably were. There was a rumor that Trump balked at the 2017 release because he was shown FBI photos of JFK’s head blown apart and told the same thing can happen to him. Pompeo, like anyone who works or worked for the CIA is not to be trusted. He was the one pushing to arrest and prosecute Assange, most likely in order to taint anything he said and to discredit him.
Jack Ruby was really Jacob Rubinstein. He often went by Jack Ruby, but Rubinstein is really his name. The reporters used the real for awhile, but then were asked to use his alias. WHY? Another strange coincidence to this strange saga. (I was a teenager at the time)
"The answer is yes. (I believe) they were involved". The two key words in the comment is "I believe" not just a definitive yes... not yes I know... just yes I believe. Which means we have an anonymous source telling us he believes the CIA was involved. Which pretty much tells us nothing.
Granted, but RFK, Jr. is not some "anonymous source," and all he is doing is repeating exactly what his father said to dozens of contemporaries in the wake of the assassination. His father was the attorney general when the assassination occurred.
I understand in 2013 RFK Jr. claimed his father told him he, RFK Sr., thought others were involved however there is this:
On September 27, 1964, Kennedy (RFK) issued a statement through his New York campaign office: "As I said in Poland last summer, I am convinced Oswald was solely responsible for what happened and that he did not have any outside help or assistance. He was a malcontent who could not get along here or in the Soviet Union."[
What and who's campaign? He made the statement in 1964. Also he was the highest govenment official at the time of the Warren Commission that did not testify besides President Johnson, even jacqueline Kennedy testified, of course she was an eye witness to the events in Dallas. Ostensibly it was said he did not testify because he was close to JFK and they (Warren) didn't want to upset him about his brothers death even more. However, it is also reported he, RFK, was knee deep in plots by the CIA and the Mafia to assassinate Castro and he and others did not want him under oath to be asked awkward questions. People want to hang their hat on RFK's private misgivings while ignoring his public statements because it fits into their theories of conspiracies No one wants to believe Oswald acted on his own. That a 24 yo loser could pop a president right under the noses of the CIA and FBI who maybe don't want the rest of the documents to come out which show how monumentally incompetant they were. Personally I am a proponet of Occam's razor when it comes of the assassination of JFK.
I asked a former CIA agent a few years back who was with them in the 60s if the CIA was involved with the JFK assassination and he replied yes, they probably were. There was a rumor that Trump balked at the 2017 release because he was shown FBI photos of JFK’s head blown apart and told the same thing can happen to him. Pompeo, like anyone who works or worked for the CIA is not to be trusted. He was the one pushing to arrest and prosecute Assange, most likely in order to taint anything he said and to discredit him.
LBJ's mistress testified that Johnson knew about it the night before and told her about it. (Johnson was thrilled!!!)
Jack Ruby was really Jacob Rubinstein. He often went by Jack Ruby, but Rubinstein is really his name. The reporters used the real for awhile, but then were asked to use his alias. WHY? Another strange coincidence to this strange saga. (I was a teenager at the time)
"The answer is yes. (I believe) they were involved". The two key words in the comment is "I believe" not just a definitive yes... not yes I know... just yes I believe. Which means we have an anonymous source telling us he believes the CIA was involved. Which pretty much tells us nothing.
Granted, but RFK, Jr. is not some "anonymous source," and all he is doing is repeating exactly what his father said to dozens of contemporaries in the wake of the assassination. His father was the attorney general when the assassination occurred.
I understand in 2013 RFK Jr. claimed his father told him he, RFK Sr., thought others were involved however there is this:
On September 27, 1964, Kennedy (RFK) issued a statement through his New York campaign office: "As I said in Poland last summer, I am convinced Oswald was solely responsible for what happened and that he did not have any outside help or assistance. He was a malcontent who could not get along here or in the Soviet Union."[
C'mon, man, that statement was for public consumption during a campaign. You're more cognizant than this. Don't be ridiculous.
What and who's campaign? He made the statement in 1964. Also he was the highest govenment official at the time of the Warren Commission that did not testify besides President Johnson, even jacqueline Kennedy testified, of course she was an eye witness to the events in Dallas. Ostensibly it was said he did not testify because he was close to JFK and they (Warren) didn't want to upset him about his brothers death even more. However, it is also reported he, RFK, was knee deep in plots by the CIA and the Mafia to assassinate Castro and he and others did not want him under oath to be asked awkward questions. People want to hang their hat on RFK's private misgivings while ignoring his public statements because it fits into their theories of conspiracies No one wants to believe Oswald acted on his own. That a 24 yo loser could pop a president right under the noses of the CIA and FBI who maybe don't want the rest of the documents to come out which show how monumentally incompetant they were. Personally I am a proponet of Occam's razor when it comes of the assassination of JFK.